Material
SS 304 vs SS 316
Where the extra corrosion resistance earns its cost, and where it does not.
The actual difference
Both are austenitic stainless steels. 316 contains molybdenum, typically around 2 to 3 per cent, which markedly improves resistance to chlorides — salt, and some cleaning chemicals. Everything else about them, including appearance, finish behaviour and fabrication, is broadly similar.
Where 304 is right
Dry interiors, most commercial and residential work, ceilings, profiles, trims, lift interiors, furniture. This is the overwhelming majority of architectural metalwork, and 304 is not a compromise in those positions — it is the correct specification.
Where 316 earns its cost
Coastal and marine exposure, swimming pool halls, spa and wet areas, food processing, external work in polluted urban environments, and anywhere subject to aggressive cleaning regimes.
The cost question
316 costs meaningfully more. Specifying it throughout a dry interior project is money that would usually do more good elsewhere in the detail — a better finish, a deeper section, a physical mock-up. Specify it where the environment actually demands it.
Both take PVD
PVD coating works on both grades. The coating does not replace the corrosion resistance of the substrate, so an aggressive environment still calls for 316 underneath.
Start a project
Specifying this?
Send the detail and MCS will review it before you commit.